Tuesday, January 28, 2014

CULTURAL ECON:, COST

Founder, Project C.U.R.E.
Author, The Happiest Man in the World: Life Lessons from a Cultural Economist


The simple, little economic trilogy of scarcity, choice, and cost may well be one of the most useful concept gadgets in your tool bag of decision making. Keep the tool handy and use it a lot.

One of the most interesting aspects of our present consumer culture is our fixation with the printed price tag. What does this item cost? Or, this week we are rolling back all the prices, or, the cost of this item is reduced until Friday. The cost to be considered in the purchase of a product or service is presented to be on the bar code or price tag. But the money you tender to the cashier may not be the cost at all. The retailer, however, has even narrowed the logic of your decision to purchase down to the common denominator of do I have enough money to buy this?

In your lifetime the culture has even erased the criterion of whether you have enough money or not in your pocket to make the purchase by supplying you with a convenient piece of plastic that nullifies the logic and allows you to make the purchase, regardless. You walk away with your purchase fully confident that you did the really smart thing because you simply could not have lived without the item another day at that irresistible price. I actually know folks who will drive all the way across town to purchase their gasoline if the price is one cent per gallon cheaper than the competition. They spend three dollars to get across town to save twenty-four cents at the pump. What was the real cost?

I remember listening to a reporter’s interview with one of the early astronauts. The reporter’s question was, how do you feel, sitting in a spacecraft that has been built by the cheapest bidder? Our thinking regarding price tags or bids sometimes does not consider the real cost.

In the discipline of economics, cost is viewed through a different set of glasses. Cost is not determined by how much money you spent or how many plastic swipes you transacted. Cost is inexorably linked to scarcity and choice. In fact, scarcity, choice, and cost are at the very heart of the study of economics. When a good or service is scarce it means that the choice of one alternative requires that the next highest alternative be given up. The very existence of alternative uses forces us to make choices. The opportunity cost of any choice is the value of the next best alternative that was lost or forgone in making that choice. The true cost of the alternative that you did not choose may or may not have anything to do with money as represented on a bar code or printed price tag.

It would be easy to give lots of illustrations of foregone opportunity cost: the university student who gives up four years of earned income and pays thousands and thousands of dollars to attend university classes he hopes will better his position for the balance of his life; the girl who gives up marrying her childhood sweetheart in lieu of a musical career in London; the farmer who decides to continue farming the old family acreage instead of selling the property to the big box store.

But I don’t have to go farther to find true-to-life examples than to consider some of my friends from the organization that I love so much: Project C.U.R.E. We have over 16,000 volunteers within the United States at our various warehouse operations and collection cities. Every one of those sixteen thousand individuals has a personal story of scarcity, choice, and cost. The stories are packed with drama and passion because they each represent personal desires and values. None has to come and volunteer. But they faithfully come by the scores . . . but at a cost. What was the value of the alternative that was lost when they decided to forego that next highest alternative and choose to volunteer their time and efforts for no money payment?

In 1999, an operating room nurse named Barb Youngberg came with another nurse friend to check out Project C.U.R.E. They had heard at a hospital staff meeting about the humanitarian organization that was functioning out of the huge Continental Airport hangers at the old Denver Stapleton airport. They were intrigued by what they saw and the idea that their efforts were saving lives all around the world. Barb and her friend made a decision to start sorting medical supplies one night a month for Project C.U.R.E.

As Project C.U.R.E. had to move around the city from one donated location to another, Barb followed and began donating more and more of her time. In 2005, she retired from her hospital job but kept volunteering. In 2007, the doctors discovered that Barb had congestive heart failure. To complicate the diagnostic procedures, they found she was allergic to the dye required for the tests. She knew exactly what the surgery entailed because she had scrubbed down and assisted in many such surgeries in the past.

Just hours after the successful diagnosis, the doctors performed open heart surgery that also included the insertion of a pacemaker. As she lay in the recovery room and then spent two and a half weeks in rehabilitation, she knew she had to make a huge decision. She was now realizing that the years of life she had left were a very scarce commodity. What would she do with those years? She had to make a decision. Would she take it easy on some leisure cruises, or relax and stay around home . . . or what?

Barb made her decision. Just as soon as she was able, she returned to Project C.U.R.E. She had decided to give the best of her life for the rest of her life helping other people be better off. Project C.U.R.E. had just moved into its permanent location near Park Meadows, in Centennial. Barb volunteered to take over the entire bio-med tech area and build it into an efficient and successful department. She already possessed the knowledge of the various pieces of equipment. Over the years of her career she had accumulated the valuable experience of working with the medical machines and pieces of technical equipment. Those were her talents. Now she could manage the inventory and lots of other people to help her build and run a successful department.

When the pieces of bio-med-tech equipment, like x-ray machines, defibrillators, e.k.g. machines, ultrasound machines, or anesthesia machines arrive on Project C.U.R.E.’s docks, Barb Youngberg knows exactly what to do to get those valuable, life-saving items ready to be shipped to the targeted hospitals and clinics in over 130 different countries working with Project C.U.R.E. around the world.

Utilizing the economic trilogy of scarcity, choice, and cost can help us make better decisions throughout our lives. In Barb Youngberg’s case, realizing she faced the scarcity of years, and knowing she had to make a choice, she gave up the options of cruises and leisure in lieu of helping to save countless lives of kids and adults around the world. We salute her for her nearly fourteen years of voluntary service at Project C.U.R.E. and her determination to make good choices.

Next week: A weakness of the economic trilogy

(Research ideas from Dr. Jackson’s new writing project on Cultural Economics)


© Dr. James W. Jackson  
Permissions granted by Winston-Crown Publishing House



Dr. James W. Jackson often describes himself as "The Happiest Man in the World." A successful businessman, award-winning author and humanitarian, Jackson is also a renowned Cultural Economist and international consultant, helping organizations and governments to apply sound economic principals to the transformation of culture so that everyone is "better off."

As the founder of Project C.U.R.E., Dr. Jackson traveled to more than one hundred fifty countries assessing healthcare facilities, meeting with government leaders and "delivering health and hope" in the form of medical supplies and equipment to the world's most needy people. Literally thousands of people are alive today as a direct result of the tireless efforts of Project C.U.R.E.'s staff, volunteers and Dr. Jackson. 

To contact Dr. Jackson, or to book him for an interview or speaking engagement: press@winstoncrown.com

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

CULTURAL ECON.: CHOICE

Founder, Project C.U.R.E.
Author, The Happiest Man in the World: Life Lessons from a Cultural Economist


So, what is the solution to the predicament of having limited resources in this old world, but having absolutely unlimited needs and wants? Even in this present culture of extreme expectation, and the generational mentality of unbelievable entitlement, you don’t always get everything you want. It seems that there will always be far more uses for a particular resource than there is supply of that resource. Your want to always gets beat up by your can do!

The simple answer to the sticky wicket question is that you ultimately have to make choices. The discipline of economics is the study of making good choices. Wouldn’t you like to know how to make better choices? Wouldn’t it be a good thing if you could learn to make better decisions so that your life would be better off and more fulfilling? Wouldn’t it be nice if your whole culture, including your government, could learn how to make informed, responsible choices?

To say yes to one thing means we say no to another. It is as simple as that. Yet, choices are closely connected with values, and that takes the issue of choices out of the simple and shoves it into the category of the complex. Would you rather purchase a home in a congested, troublesome neighborhood close to your work, or own a home with a few acres out away from the city, where you can enjoy a quality of life and space enough to raise your family, but spend all your time in your car or on the transit, commuting and arriving at home after your family is already in bed asleep?

In our local county, the residents get all excited about preserving certain pieces of land that perhaps have a lovely view of one of Colorado’s snow-covered mountains. They feel that they have a certain inheritance giving them birthright to always having an unencumbered shot at looking westward at the sunset and seeing that particular mountain. So the residents, especially the ones just across the street from the property, put up campaign signs, run ads in the local paper, hold meetings, and petition the open space committee of the county to purchase the land so that no homes can be built in the whole valley, thus successfully preserving the view.

Of course the action becomes contagious, and the race begins to protect everyone’s view of every beautiful snow-covered mountain. Then it begins to dawn on the people that they have just emptied the coffers of the county to preserve all the views. They have just removed forty-five percent of the open real estate in the county from the property tax rolls, and have, moreover, eliminated the possibility of future residential and commercial development that would have provided financial sustainability in perpetuity. By their choices, they have forfeited the possibility of generating necessary revenue to pay all the bills. But the views are nice, especially for the folks who live just across the street from the property.

Choices can become difficult and complex whether they involve just the individual, the family, the corporation, the community, or the national government. When it comes to dealing with limited resources and unlimited wishes, there will always be tension. The choices we must make as a result of scarcity of resources will always include at least the following issues:
  • What should be produced from those limited resources?
  • Who should produce and distribute the goods and services?
  • How should goods and services be produced?
  • For whom should goods and services be produced?             
Next Week:  The cost of choices.

             (Research ideas from Dr. Jackson’s new writing project on Cultural Economics)

© Dr. James W. Jackson  
Permissions granted by Winston-Crown Publishing House


Dr. James W. Jackson often describes himself as "The Happiest Man in the World." A successful businessman, award-winning author and humanitarian, Jackson is also a renowned Cultural Economist and international consultant, helping organizations and governments to apply sound economic principals to the transformation of culture so that everyone is "better off."

As the founder of Project C.U.R.E., Dr. Jackson traveled to more than one hundred fifty countries assessing healthcare facilities, meeting with government leaders and "delivering health and hope" in the form of medical supplies and equipment to the world's most needy people. Literally thousands of people are alive today as a direct result of the tireless efforts of Project C.U.R.E.'s staff, volunteers and Dr. Jackson. 

To contact Dr. Jackson, or to book him for an interview or speaking engagement: press@winstoncrown.com

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

CULTURAL ECON.: SCARCITY

Founder, Project C.U.R.E.
Author, The Happiest Man in the World: Life Lessons from a Cultural Economist


When I was growing up, we had a colloquial phrase we used to express something that was really difficult to find. We would say that is scarcer than hen’s teeth. Wow! Everybody knew how scarce hen’s teeth were to find.

When I started studying the subject of economics, I learned a little different meaning of the word scarcity. It wasn’t that things were hard to find, it was that anything capable of having at least two alternative uses is considered scarce. It is scarce because we can figure out more uses for each commodity than there are commodities. Our wants and desires for the things that we can produce from those commodities are limitless. Our resources are limited and our desires and demands are unlimited. Therefore, we live in a world of scarcity. There is just so much of anything and no more.

Now, the questions arise in the end, how will that commodity be used? Who will get to produce something from the commodity? What product will be realized out of the commodity? For whom should the goods or services be made from the commodity? When the commodity is used to produce something, can the commodity be replaced or duplicated? Can it be recycled for another go around?

The question of scarcity is a question of cultural economics because it involves people and their behavior. It is a great study just to observe how people decide to answer the above questions. Everybody would like to have more and better everything, so our unlimited wants are forever smashing into the limits of our resources, forcing us to pick some alternatives and reject others.

When Jackson Brothers Investments was involved in real estate development in the ski areas of Colorado in the late 1960s and 1970s, we owned a motel right in the middle of the Winter Park Village on Highway 40. We wanted to build the local post office there, thinking that if we owned the post office building on our ten acres we would always have a say in where the center of the village would remain. If we could get the contract for the post office, it would also make the remainder of the property surrounding the post office more valuable forever. But we couldn’t use the ground for a post office and more development sites if the motel continued to fill the space.

At that point, the highway property on ten acres in the middle of the village became a scarce commodity. It had at least two viable alternatives for use. Additionally, other people were knocking at our door wanting to buy the property for projects of their own. But, we thought to ourselves, the motel is presently giving us cash flow, and if we tear it down the income will stop. So what should we do? You are right! We scraped it, hauled off the debris, built the post office, and lived happily ever after.

We have to face this economic principle of scarcity every day of our lives. Do we go to the gym and work out next Tuesday after work, or do we use the time to get the oil changed in our car? Time becomes a scarce commodity, and we have unlimited demands on that piece of time. It seems that virtually everything is scarce. We used to think that the air we breathe was a free commodity. But then we realized we had to either keep it clean and breathable, or we could dump garbage into it.

We used to consider the space above the earth as a free good: it just goes on forever. But now we discover that conflicts are even arising over the allocation of orbital slots. They, too, are becoming scarce commodities for our telecommunication satellites. Commercial airlines end up squabbling over new and improved “highways in the skies.” Maybe, the power of gravity that keeps us tethered to this old earth can be used as an example of a remaining free good. But almost everything you can think of is a scarce commodity simply because it has limited uses and we have unlimited desires and demands. So, what does all that have to do with cultural economics?

Next week: The matter of choice.

(Research ideas from Dr. Jackson's new writing project on Cultural Economics)

© Dr. James W. Jackson  
Permissions granted by Winston-Crown Publishing House


Dr. James W. Jackson often describes himself as "The Happiest Man in the World." A successful businessman, award-winning author and humanitarian, Jackson is also a renowned Cultural Economist and international consultant, helping organizations and governments to apply sound economic principals to the transformation of culture so that everyone is "better off."

As the founder of Project C.U.R.E., Dr. Jackson traveled to more than one hundred fifty countries assessing healthcare facilities, meeting with government leaders and "delivering health and hope" in the form of medical supplies and equipment to the world's most needy people. Literally thousands of people are alive today as a direct result of the tireless efforts of Project C.U.R.E.'s staff, volunteers and Dr. Jackson. 

To contact Dr. Jackson, or to book him for an interview or speaking engagement: press@winstoncrown.com

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

CULTURAL ECON.: A WORKING DEFINITION

Founder, Project C.U.R.E.
Author, The Happiest Man in the World: Life Lessons from a Cultural Economist


I will take the opportunity at the beginning of this new year to thank Winston Crown Publishing House for inviting me to continue writing these articles under their banner. It has been a delight to work with them since their publishing of my book, What’cha Gonna Do With What’cha Got? in1982. I look forward to sharing with my reading friends the ongoing literary adventure of investigation, information, and inspiration. Thanks for the opportunity!

*****

In especially the last twenty-five articles, we have talked a lot about Cultural Economics. Perhaps it is time to inject some basic definitions. The word economics comes from the Greek words oikos (a house) and nemein (to manage) and quite simply deals with the efficient allocation and management of goods and services.

I like to think of economics as the study of making good choices under conditions of scarcity . . . or even abundance. Economics is not all about charts with axis points, slopes, and curves. To me, economics is all about people. People with their emotions of love, joy, surprise, anger, sadness, and fear make up cultures, and cultures affect economics. And, of course, in turn, the chosen system of economics affects the cultures and individual persons.

Cultural Economics is the branch of economics that concerns itself with the relationship of culture to economic outcomes. It studies how various aspects of human cultures interact with economic events, behaviors and conditions. A given culture will even influence the political system with its traditions, religious beliefs, the formation of institutions, and the value ascribed to individuals.

Sometimes folks raise their eyebrows at me when I suggest to them that the major defense for the existence of economists is to accurately predict the future. They are expected to be fortune tellers. They collect their data about what is apparently going on in the world, compile their evidence, and arrange it neatly on charts and graphs. Then, they go back to their study cubicles and see if their data matches up with what they had been espousing as a theory of truth. There is a supposition with economists that future reality will be an extension of past reality. If they feel their findings are trustworthy enough, they project into the future some expected outcome. If they are right about the future they become acclaimed economists . . . if not, they go to work for the government.

Economics, however, is a great practical exercise and is not a Dismal Science, as Thomas Carlyle referred to it in his essay written in 1849. When we consider that there are well over seven billion individuals alive on earth today, and they are each making scores of individual choices right now, it is a bit overwhelming. Each person is involved in trying to figure out how to make better choices regarding efficiently allocating and managing the resources of land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurs, and how they are going to organize and manage the production of millions and millions of goods and services all at the same time.

In the studying of cultural economics we have the thrill of taking some basic principles of economics and combining them with the unpredictable thoughts, choices, and actions of over seven billion people on earth today. That makes for an exciting adventure that can open our eyes to the understanding of motives, methods, behaviors, successes, and failures regarding our world’s resources and human life styles. Follow the money.

My love and interdisciplinary bias certainly leans toward the behavioral aspects of the study of economics rather than the pure analytical number crunching of the econometrics laboratory. So, the notes and research findings presented in the future articles will be aimed at how people affect economic systems and how cultures are affected by economic choices. Who knows, I might even throw in some moral observations I have witnessed in my travels around the world regarding peoples’ influence on economics, and the economic influences on the cultures of this old world. 

Next week: Scarcity, choice, and cost.
(Research ideas from Dr. Jackson’s new writing project on Cultural Economics)


© Dr. James W. Jackson  
Permissions granted by Winston-Crown Publishing House


Dr. James W. Jackson often describes himself as "The Happiest Man in the World." A successful businessman, award-winning author and humanitarian, Jackson is also a renowned Cultural Economist and international consultant, helping organizations and governments to apply sound economic principals to the transformation of culture so that everyone is "better off."

As the founder of Project C.U.R.E., Dr. Jackson traveled to more than one hundred fifty countries assessing healthcare facilities, meeting with government leaders and "delivering health and hope" in the form of medical supplies and equipment to the world's most needy people. Literally thousands of people are alive today as a direct result of the tireless efforts of Project C.U.R.E.'s staff, volunteers and Dr. Jackson. 

To contact Dr. Jackson, or to book him for an interview or speaking engagement: press@winstoncrown.com